Complaints and Grievances Policy and Procedures


Wesley College (the College) recognises that it is in the best interest of students and parents or guardians for there to be a trusting and co-operative relationship between members of the community and the College. Complaints and grievances are an important way for the College community to provide information and feedback to the College and request a formal response or corrective action.

Wesley College recognises a person’s right to make a complaint and its responsibility to provide a framework within which efforts can be made to resolve complaints.

Wesley College believes that complaints are best handled in an environment where people feel able to speak up about issues concerning the education and wellbeing of students and conduct of staff.

An effective complaint-handling system has a clear process for resolving complaints, treats people fairly, is timely and provides those people involved in a complaint with a fair opportunity to respond to issues and to present their views.


This policy does not apply to matters about which there are existing rights (and processes) for review and appeal, such as matters relating to serious employee misconduct, student critical incidents and criminal activities.

When addressing concerns or complaints, Wesley College must:

  • abide by relevant regulatory and legislative frameworks
  • maintain confidentiality
  • balance the rights and responsibilities of all parties
  • ensure all parties are aware of their right to advocacy
  • act in a manner that seeks to achieve an outcome acceptable to all parties

All overseas students are required to comply with student visa conditions and Wesley College has a duty to comply with all appropriate student welfare support arrangements until the relevant complaints or appeals process is resolved.

Complaints Managers

At Wesley College, the Complaints Manager at each Campus is the relevant Head of Campus unless delegated. The relevant Head of Campus, in consultation with the Principal, may appoint an Investigator to review the details of a complaint and submit a report. The Investigator may be an internal staff member of appropriate authority or a suitably qualified and experienced external provider.

If the complaint is about an issue at Clunes or Outdoor Education, the Complaints Manager is the Associate to the Principal. If the complaint is about a Head of Campus or other College Executive member, the Complaints Manager is the Principal. If the complaint is about the Principal, the Complaint Manager is the President of College Council.

Purpose of this Policy

The purpose of this policy is to ensure that:

  • Wesley College meets its obligation to respond to complaints and grievances in a fair, effective and efficient manner
  • Members of the community are informed of how they can make a complaint and the process to resolve the matter

This policy applies to all students, parents, staff and members of the Wesley College community  of Wesley College.


For the purpose of this policy the following terms are defined as follows:

  • a “complaint” and/or “grievance” is an expression of dissatisfaction with an action taken, decision made or service provided, or the failure to provide a service, take action or make a decision at the College.
  • a ‘parent’ includes:
    • a person who has parental responsibility for ‘major long term issues’ as defined in the Family Law Act 1975 (Commonwealth)
    • a person appointed as ‘guardian’ pursuant to the Children Youth and Families Act 2005 (Victoria)
    • an informal carer with whom the child normally or regularly resides, and who has day- to-day care and control of the child
  • an adult student is any enrolled person 18 years or over
  • a complaint is considered to be ‘unresolved’ when agreement cannot be reached on a course of action and/or a remedy, or if the remedy cannot be implemented.
  • a complaint is considered to be ‘resolved’ when an acceptable outcome to both parties has been reached.
  • a complaint is considered to be ‘finalised’ when the Principal has made a final determination on the matter after exhausting the processes set out in this policy
Guiding Principles

Wesley College’s complaint-handling process reflects the following guiding principles, which are informed by the Australian/New Zealand Standard – Guidelines for complaint management in organizations (AS/NZS 10002:2014).

  1. Visibility
    Information about how and where to make a complaint, as well as how a complaint will be handled, should be regularly publicised within the College community. The actions taken to respond to a complaint should be well documented and include the reasons underpinning any decisions made.
  2. Accessibility
    Information about how to make a complaint and the College’s procedures when responding to a complaint should be easily accessible. The complaint-handling process should be flexible and include the ability to make a complaint in person, by phone and in writing. Support should also be given to complainants with special needs, including translations, interpreters and enabling a complainant to seek the services of an advocate.
  3. Responsiveness
    Receipt of written complaints should be acknowledged by communicating with the complainant as soon as possible. Complaints should be addressed promptly and the complainant kept informed of the progress of their complaint when the matter is complex and will take time to bring to resolution.
  4. Objectivity
    Each complaint must be treated in an equitable, objective and unbiased manner.
  5. Cost
    There should be no cost to the complainant for access to the complaint-handling process at the College.
  6. Protection of Privacy
    Personally identifiable information concerning the complainant should be actively protected from disclosure except where needed in relation to the complaint. This means that the complaint should only be discussed with those directly involved in the complaint-handling process.
  7. Student-focused
    The College should be open to feedback including complaints and should show a commitment to resolving complaints with the educational wellbeing of students as the first priority.
  8. Accountability
    Schools are required to have a fair, effective and efficient complaint- handling process. Schools are accountable, both internally and externally, for their decision making and complaint-handling performance. Schools need to be able to provide explanations and reasons for their decisions.
  9. Continual Improvement
    Complaint-handling procedures should be regularly reviewed for improvement. Complaint data and feedback should be used to identify recurrent themes and to implement improvement measures where a need is identified.
General information about handling complaints and grievances

Wesley College maintains and publicises a fair, effective and efficient complaint-handling process, so that complaints and grievances about events or decisions at the College can be addressed.

The Principal is responsible for the efficient and effective organisation, management and administration of the College including the College’s complaint-handling processes.

Members of the community who have a complaint should, in the first instance, make the complaint to the appropriate staff member. This may be the class teacher, Homeroom Teacher/Tutor, Head of Year, Head of House, Head of Clunes, Head of School, Head of Campus, Director of Learning, Associate to the Principal or Principal. Complaints about the College Principal should be referred to the President of College Council.

When addressing a complaint, it is expected that community members and College staff will:

  • show respect and understanding of each other’s point of view
  • operate within applicable legislation
  • acknowledge that their goal is to achieve an outcome acceptable to all parties
  • act in good faith and in a calm and courteous manner
  • recognise that all parties have rights and responsibilities which must be balanced.
Unreasonable complainant conduct

All complaints should be considered in accordance with the College’s complaint-handling procedures, outlined in this document, including when the complaining party’s behaviour is thought to be unreasonable.

The relevant Complaints Manager considers a range of factors and views. However, the Complaints Manager, in consultation with the Principal, may at any point in the process outlined in this policy consider a complaining party’s behaviour to be unreasonable. In these circumstances, it is appropriate for the Principal to communicate the basis on which the conclusion was made to the complainant in writing. The Principal may also indicate an acceptable procedure for  future communication with the complainant about their complaint.

Wesley College considers behaviour to be unreasonable when:

  • it is clearly and significantly outside the expectations of co-operation, courtesy and respect
  • it calls for staff resources and time unjustified by the nature or significance of the complaint
  • an action or complaint is brought without merit, often to cause annoyance to another person
  • it is oriented towards conflict
  • it has an unreasonable cost impact to the College.
Role of the College

Complaints and grievances are addressed in an environment where parties feel able to speak up about issues concerning the education and welfare of their children, about functions/operations of the College, or about student behaviour in the general community. This is reflected in open, two- way communication within the College, clear roles and responsibilities for all members of the College community, realistic expectations about what can be achieved by the College and an effective,  published complaints and grievances handling procedure.

The College’s initial response to an incident or issue at the College is critical. It is appropriate to acknowledge what has occurred with those involved and offer an expression of regret for any upset or distress they may have experienced. Those involved in the matter should be assured that the complaint will be explored and, where possible, a full explanation will be provided once the facts are known. Where appropriate, the College should also indicate the steps it intends to take to prevent a similar incident or issue from occurring again.

College Responsibilities

It is the responsibility of the College to respond to and address written (letter and email) and verbal (face-to-face and phone) complaints raised. (Refer appendix 1 for detailed procedures of complaint response)

Wesley College:

  • maintains fair procedures for complaint-handling. As a minimum the procedures include:
  • who to contact when making a complaint
  • a description of the actions the College could take once a complaint is received
  • a time frame for acknowledging written complaints and an expected time frame for complaint resolution
  • the types of outcomes that the complainant could expect
  • information about what the College will do if the complaint is not able to be resolved by the College and the options the complainant has to take their complaint further
  • considers all complaints by:
    • raising the issues in the complaint with relevant staff and/or members of the College community
    • consulting, where appropriate, with relevant external stakeholders for technical or other advice
    • discussing the College’s findings with the complainant in an attempt to reach an agreed resolution
    • considering the engagement of a mediator where a complaint has the potential to become intractable
  • publicises the College’s complaint-handling procedures within the College community and make them readily available
  • reviews the College’s complaint-handling procedures regularly
  • ensures that formal complaints and grievances received are recorded and actions taken to resolve the complaint are well documented
  • ensures a College record of all formal complaints, both written and verbal, is maintained
  • ensures all College staff are aware of the College’s complaint-handling procedures
  • actively assists community members with the complaint process, informing them that at any point of the complaint process they are able to be supported by a support person. The complainant should inform the appropriate Complaint Manager if they want to include a support person in the complaint process and provide the name, contact details and the relationship to the complainant. A support person’s role may include:
  • assistance for the complainant to clarify the issues in the complaint
  • discussion of difficulties being experienced by the complainant
    • assistance in the development of a co-operative and collaborative working relationship between the complainant and the College community
    • assistance for the complainant to understand the Colleges’ policy and guidelines and the resolution being proposed for the complaint.
Resolving complaints

The Principal may enlist the services of external bodies to help resolve a complaint. Where a complaint is found to be justified, Wesley College is able to resolve the complaint by:

  • an apology or expression of regret
  • a change of decision
  • a change of policy, procedure or practice
  • offering the opportunity for counselling or other support
Complaints Register

The College will maintain a Register of Complaints. As noted in the attached procedure, complaints will not be added to the Register if:

  • they are deemed minor, frivolous or
  • are resolved using the informal process noted in the procedure.
  • complaints will be added to the Register if:
  • they are deemed vexatious (and dismissed as a result) or
  • follow the formal resolution process noted in the procedure.

From time to time, the College Council will review the activity noted on the Complaints Register and review any key areas of concern or issues that are regularly reported. The College Council may request additional detail from the Principal on:

  • trending complaint areas and/or
  • any specific impact on the College – Financial or Reputational.
Procedures for Handling Complaints

When the College receives a complaint (either written or verbal), the College must follow the processes outlined in the following steps:

  1. Report the Complaint
    A complaint is made by a parent, student, staff member or member of the College Community or the general public to a member of staff. Members of the general public can make a formal complaint to the College via the College’s Whistleblower Portal, available on the College website.
  2. Acknowledge the complaint
    The member of staff will acknowledge receipt of the complaint and will pass the information to the appropriate Complaints Manager.
  3. Record the complaint
    The complaint is recorded in the on – line system and the appropriate Complaints Manager is notified. The Complaints Manager will determine if the complaint is vexatious or frivolous. If the complaint is deemed vexatious or frivolous, the complainant will be advised and no investigation  will be conducted.
  4. Complaint handling
    There are two different ways of handling complaints: through an informal process or a formal process. The Complaints Manager will determine the initial response based on consultation with members of the Campus Executive Team and the complexity of the complaint.

a) Informal process
Most complaints, concerns and disputes raised with a staff member are of a minor nature, or the complaint is a result of misunderstanding or lack of communication. These kinds of complaints are better resolved through an informal process. Informal procedures can take three distinct forms:

  • an informal discussion between the Head of Campus or appropriate member of the Campus Executive and the complainant often leads to resolution (sometimes, the complainant may just want the Head of Campus or appropriate member of Camus Executive to talk to the College staff member on their behalf)
  • the Head of Campus or appropriate member of Campus Executive talks to both the complainant and the respondent separately and then reaches a resolution
  • the Head of Campus or appropriate member of Campus Executive can bring the complainant and respondent together for conciliation

Note: If a complaint is resolved through the informal process, the complaint will not be added to the Complaints Register.

b)  Conciliation
Conciliation is not mandatory; however, bringing the complainant and respondent together to discuss their different perspectives on the issue encourages quick and simple resolution. If the complaint is resolved at this point, the complainant will be formally advised in writing by the appropriate Complaints Manager.

If, however, the informal process does not resolve the complaint, then formal procedures should be implemented. Note that an informal process may be formalised at any time by the Principal, Heads of Campus, the complainant or the respondent.

c)Formal process

There are three steps to the formal procedure:

  1. investigating the complaint;
  2. making a finding;
  3. determining appropriate action.

Formal procedures begin with requesting the complaint be put in writing, if it has not already been done. To investigate the complaint, the Principal, Head of Campus or investigator must:

  • establish the precise nature of the complaint
  • investigate the complaint for substance
  • notify the respondent in writing of the complaints against them
  • advise both the complainant and respondent of their right to have a support person with them at all interviews and discussions
  • interview the complainant and respondent separately
  • keep written accounts of all interviews and discussions

Note: If a complaint is moved to the formal process for resolution, it will be added to the Complaints Register.
Dismissal of complaint
To make a finding, the Principal, Head of Campus, relevant member of Campus Executive or investigator must consider all the evidence. If it is established the complaint has no substance and evidence is vague or ill-defined, then the complaint can be dismissed. A letter outlining the outcome of the investigation must be sent to both the complainant and the respondent.

Unsatisfactory performance procedures

If the evidence is clear and the Principal or the Head of Campus can substantiate the complaint, appropriate action will then be determined by the Principal.
A written response outlining the issues, the decision made, and the outcome of the complaint will be sent to both the complainant and the respondent.
It may not always be possible to resolve all complaints to the complainant’s satisfaction. This could happen when the nature of the issues raised in the complaint is governed by Wesley College policies or procedures or if the complainant has unrealistic expectations about the outcome of their complaint.

Reportable Conduct and Misconduct

If the complaint fulfills the definition of reportable conduct, the conduct will be reported to the Commission for Children and Young People (CCYP). If it involves alleged misconduct by a teacher, it will be reported to the Victorian Institute of Teaching. When the complaint involves such reports, it must be treated through the formal process outlined above.

Service Standards
ActionResponse from date of receipt of complaint
Acknowledge complaint2 school working days
Assess the request and respond10 school working days
Complete investigation and notify complainant of outcome45 school working days

Note: School working days does not include term breaks or non-student days. When an external investigation is undertaken, the response may take longer than 45 school working days.

Frivolous or Vexatious complaints

Vexatious complaints are considered serious misconduct. If a complaint is determined by the Complaints Manager, in due course, to be vexatious or frivolous in nature, then the Principal or the Head of Campus can dismiss the complaint with no further action. The Head of Campus will advise the complainant if the complaint is dismissed, and on what grounds.
Such vexatious or frivolous complaints can result in action under the Community Conduct Policy.

Note: In these instances, the complaint will be added to the Complaints Register to ensure that an historical record is available for future reference.

For the purpose of this policy:
*Vexatious is defined as a claim made for the sole purpose of harassing or injuring another party.
*Frivolous is defined as a claim that has no merit whatsoever.

Confidentiality and documentation

Complaint handling procedures must be confidential in nature.
It is the Principal’s (or Principal’s delegate’s) and the Head of Campus’ responsibility to ensure that all complaints are handled with absolute confidentiality and that all documents are confidentially  and securely stored.

Students with a disability

Students with disabilities have rights under the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Commonwealth), the Disability Standards for Education 2005 (Commonwealth) and the Equal Opportunity Act 2010 (Victoria) to access their education on the same basis as their peers, including the right to reasonable adjustments.

As with all complaints to which this policy applies, parents should raise any concerns or complaints regarding the treatment of a student with a disability with the College in the first instance. Wesley College also recognises that parents of students with a disability can raise complaints or concerns regarding a student with a disability in a number of forums, including:
*the Australian Human Rights Commission – in relation to complaints regarding compliance with the Disability Discrimination Act or the Disability Standards for Education
*the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission – in relation to complaints regarding compliance with the Equal Opportunity Act

Decision review

If the complainant is not satisfied with the investigation process or the official outcome, they may present written notification to the Principal if the decision was made by a Head of Campus. If the complainant is not satisfied after review by the Principal or if the decision was made by the Principal or the complaint is about the Principal, the complainant can then write to the President of College Council, requesting a review of the complaint resolution process.
The President of the College Council  will consider the request if:

  1. new information is provided, and confirmed by the Chair after review,
  2. a breach of procedure is established, or
  3. the matter is considered to relate to the Board’s responsibilities and  function

The President of College Council (or delegate) will:

  1. Acknowledge receipt of the request within 5 school working days
  2. Assess the request and provide a written response on next steps within a further 10 school working days.
  3. Complete the assessment and provide an outcome within a further 30 school working days.

Note: School working days do not include term breaks or non-student days.

The outcome will be:

  1. To endorse the decision of the Principal of the College, or
  2. Request the Principal to conduct a new investigation to review the complaint on the basis of any new information received, or an issue related to procedural breach.

The President of College Council will inform the complainant of their decision.


In the event that a dispute between a complainant and the College is unable to be resolved within the College, the complainant is within their rights to raise the dispute with the CEO of the VRQA who can investigate the matter and seek resolution of the matter in accordance with their legislative responsibilities.

Contact VRQA on 03 9637 2806 or

VRQA website: